The team has public indicators, but the map needs to explain where risk is concentrated, what the data can support, and what still needs local verification.
- Decision pressure
- A grant narrative or planning memo is weaker when the map looks polished but the sources, assumptions, and limitations are not clear.
- What gets reviewed
- Study area, grant or planning goal, public risk indicators, existing PDFs or maps, and the audience that needs to trust the result.
- What you receive
- A map memo with priority areas, source notes, plain-language interpretation, limits, and recommended checks before the map is used externally.
- Business value
- The team gets a stronger technical appendix and a clearer explanation for funders, reviewers, partners, or community meetings.